- artstor.blog
- Compare
- EBO-626 vs Scriba 195 S
Denver EBO-626 vs Woxter Scriba 195 S
What EBO-626 does better (3) and where Scriba 195 S wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Screen2.4
2.7Comfort & build9.6
4.2Battery2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
EBO-626Scriba 195 S
| EBO-626 | Scriba 195 S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169 mm | 136 mm | +33 mm |
| Width | 113 mm | 75 mm | +38 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm | = |
| Weight | 395 g | 100 g | +295 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is EBO-626 better than Scriba 195 S?
- Battery capacity1,500 mAh vs 800 mAh+88%
- Screen size6″ vs 4.7″+28%
- USB-CYes · Scriba 195 S: No
Why is Scriba 195 S better than EBO-626?
- Weight395 g vs 100 g4×
- Pixel density212 ppi vs 234 ppi+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Screen | ||
| Screen size | 6″ | 4.7″ |
| Resolution | 1024 × 758 | 960 × 540 |
| Pixel density | 212 ppi | 234 ppi |
| Screen technology | E Ink Carta | E Ink Pearl |
| Colour screen | No | No |
| Grey levels | — | 16 |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 395 g | 100 g |
| Width | 113 mm | 75 mm |
| Height | 169 mm | 136 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,500 mAh | 800 mAh |
| USB-C | Yes | No |
| Storage | ||
| Storage | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Software & books | ||
| Supported formats | EPUB, PDF, MOBI, FB2, DOC, RTF, TXT, HTML, CHM | EPUB, PDF, FB2, DOC, RTF, TXT, HTML |
| EPUB support | Yes | Yes |
| Audiobooks / audio playback | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & audio | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | — |
