- artstor.blog
- Compare
- MatePad Paper vs InkPad Eo
Huawei MatePad Paper vs PocketBook InkPad Eo
What MatePad Paper does better (2) and where InkPad Eo wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Screen9.0
6.6Comfort & build2.2
6.7Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad PaperInkPad Eo
| MatePad Paper | InkPad Eo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 225.2 mm | 226 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Width | 182.7 mm | 191 mm | −8.3 mm |
| Thickness | 6.6 mm | 7 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 360 g | 470 g | −110 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad Paper better than InkPad Eo?
- Weight360 g vs 470 g+31%
- Thickness6.6 mm vs 7 mm+5%
Why is InkPad Eo better than MatePad Paper?
- Pixel density227 ppi vs 300 ppi+32%
Specifications
Side by side
| Screen | ||
| Screen size | 10.3″ | 10.3″ |
| Resolution | 1872 × 1404 | 2480 × 1860 |
| Pixel density | 227 ppi | 300 ppi |
| Screen technology | — | E Ink Kaleido 3 |
| Colour screen | — | Yes |
| Colour pixel density | — | 150 ppi |
| Grey levels | — | 16 |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Front light | Yes | Yes |
| Warm light (adjustable colour temperature) | — | Yes |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 360 g | 470 g |
| Width | 182.7 mm | 191 mm |
| Height | 225.2 mm | 226 mm |
| Thickness | 6.6 mm | 7 mm |
| Colours | — | Grey |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Storage | ||
| Storage | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM | — | 4 GB |
| Pen & notes | ||
| Pen support (handwriting) | Yes | Yes |
| Software & books | ||
| Platform | — | Android |
| Operating system | — | Android |
| Google Play apps | — | No |
| Built-in bookstore | — | PocketBook Store |
| Supported formats | EPUB, PDF, DOCX, DOC, TXT, HTML | EPUB, PDF, MOBI, AZW3, AZW, FB2, DJVU, CBZ, CBR, DOCX, DOC, RTF, TXT, HTML, PRC |
| EPUB support | Yes | Yes |
| Text-to-speech | — | Yes |
| Audiobooks / audio playback | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & audio | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile data (4G / LTE) | No | No |
| Camera | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| CPU clock | — | 2.3 GHz |
