- artstor.blog
- Compare
- Nia vs Scriba 195 S
Kobo Nia vs Woxter Scriba 195 S
What Nia does better (3) and where Scriba 195 S wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Screen2.4
4.9Comfort & build9.6
2.5Battery2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
NiaScriba 195 S
| Nia | Scriba 195 S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159 mm | 136 mm | +23 mm |
| Width | 112 mm | 75 mm | +37 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 172 g | 100 g | +72 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nia better than Scriba 195 S?
- Storage8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 800 mAh+25%
- Screen size6″ vs 4.7″+28%
Why is Scriba 195 S better than Nia?
- Weight172 g vs 100 g+72%
- Pixel density212 ppi vs 234 ppi+10%
- Memory card slotNo · Nia: Yes
- Thickness9 mm vs 8 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Screen | ||
| Screen size | 6″ | 4.7″ |
| Resolution | 1024 × 758 | 960 × 540 |
| Pixel density | 212 ppi | 234 ppi |
| Screen technology | — | E Ink Pearl |
| Colour screen | No | No |
| Grey levels | — | 16 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Front light | Yes | — |
| Warm light (adjustable colour temperature) | No | — |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 172 g | 100 g |
| Width | 112 mm | 75 mm |
| Height | 159 mm | 136 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8 mm |
| Physical page-turn buttons | No | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 800 mAh |
| USB-C | No | No |
| Storage | ||
| Storage | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 32 GB |
| Pen & notes | ||
| Pen support (handwriting) | No | — |
| Software & books | ||
| Platform | Own Linux-based system | — |
| Google Play apps | No | — |
| Built-in bookstore | Rakuten Kobo Store | — |
| Supported formats | EPUB, PDF, MOBI, CBZ, CBR, RTF, TXT, HTML | EPUB, PDF, FB2, DOC, RTF, TXT, HTML |
| EPUB support | Yes | Yes |
| Public library lending (OverDrive / Libby / Onleihe) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & audio | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Mobile data (4G / LTE) | No | — |
