- artstor.blog
- Compare
- Tab Ultra vs MatePad Paper
Boox Tab Ultra vs Huawei MatePad Paper
What Tab Ultra does better (1) and where MatePad Paper wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.5Screen3.8
4.6Comfort & build6.6
3.6Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Tab UltraMatePad Paper
| Tab Ultra | MatePad Paper | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 225 mm | 225.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 184.5 mm | 182.7 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 6.7 mm | 6.6 mm | = |
| Weight | 480 g | 360 g | +120 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tab Ultra better than MatePad Paper?
- Storage128 GB vs 64 GB2×
Why is MatePad Paper better than Tab Ultra?
- Weight480 g vs 360 g+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Screen | ||
| Screen size | 10.3″ | 10.3″ |
| Resolution | 1872 × 1404 | 1872 × 1404 |
| Pixel density | 227 ppi | 227 ppi |
| Screen technology | E Ink Carta | — |
| Colour screen | No | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Front light | Yes | Yes |
| Warm light (adjustable colour temperature) | Yes | — |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 480 g | 360 g |
| Width | 184.5 mm | 182.7 mm |
| Height | 225 mm | 225.2 mm |
| Thickness | 6.7 mm | 6.6 mm |
| Physical page-turn buttons | No | — |
| Auto-rotation (G-sensor) | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,300 mAh | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Storage | ||
| Storage | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM | 4 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Pen & notes | ||
| Pen support (handwriting) | Yes | Yes |
| Software & books | ||
| Platform | Android | — |
| Operating system | Android 11 | — |
| Google Play apps | Yes | — |
| Built-in bookstore | Google Play Books (app) | — |
| Supported formats | EPUB, PDF, MOBI, AZW3, FB2, DJVU, CBZ, CBR, DOCX, DOC, RTF, TXT, HTML, CHM, PRC | EPUB, PDF, DOCX, DOC, TXT, HTML |
| EPUB support | Yes | Yes |
| Audiobooks / audio playback | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & audio | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile data (4G / LTE) | No | No |
| Built-in speaker | Yes | — |
| Microphone | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
